Re: uintptr_t for Datum
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: uintptr_t for Datum |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 630.1262277648@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | uintptr_t for Datum (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: uintptr_t for Datum
Re: uintptr_t for Datum |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> Attached patch is the part of the win64 patch that changes Datum to be
> uintptr_t, and associated changes, with only very minor changes from
> me. It also includes autoconf tests that I tricked Bruce into fixing
> for me :-)
> Comments?
This is a joke no? Where's the logic to provide a definition of
intptr_t if the platform fails to? The lack of attention to updating
the comments about Datum doesn't give me a warm feeling either.
BTW, it looks like the patch is showing a manual change to
pg_config.h.in. Don't do that. Run autoheader.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: