Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible
Дата
Msg-id 628b07b79743e2614ab1724f516cbd41560d6551.camel@j-davis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, 2022-12-26 at 14:20 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Please review the attached v2 patch further.

I'm still unclear on the performance goals of this patch. I see that it
will reduce syscalls, which sounds good, but to what end?

Does it allow a greater number of walsenders? Lower replication
latency? Less IO bandwidth? All of the above?


--
Jeff Davis
PostgreSQL Contributor Team - AWS

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BF animal malleefowl reported an failure in 001_password.pl
Следующее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: backup.sgml typo