Re: Going, going, GUCs!

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Going, going, GUCs!
Дата
Msg-id 6268.1256077130@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Going, going, GUCs!  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Ответы Re: Going, going, GUCs!  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> add_missing_from (should be off)
> regex_flavor (should be advanced, regex flavor can be controlled on a per-regex basis when they're advanced)

I believe that we do have consensus on removing those two, based on
discussions here and here respectively:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00958.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00807.php

Each of those threads established that there was a nontrivial
identifiable benefit to removing the particular option, not just that
somebody thought it was useless.  I think the rest of the list needs
to be held to a similar standard before removing anything.

Meanwhile, last chance for anyone to object to killing these two?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Application name patch - v2
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Application name patch - v2