Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6258.1255027975@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING
Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> BTW what was the conclusion of the idea about having three separate
>> nodes Insert, Delete, Update instead of a single Dml node?
> If we stick with a single node type then I'd suggest calling it
> something like ModifyTable.
I'm starting to work on this patch now. After looking at it a bit,
it seems to me that keeping it as one node is probably marginally
preferable to making three nodes; but I still do not like the "Dml"
name. Does anyone have a problem with the ModifyTable suggestion,
or a better idea?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: