Re: Reviewing freeze map code

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Taking out GUCs is not
>> easier than taking out statement parameters; you risk breaking
>> applications either way.

> Agreed, but that doesn't really answer the question of which one we
> should have, if either.  My gut feeling on this is to either do
> nothing or add a VACUUM option (not a GUC, not a reloption) called
> even_frozen_pages, default false.  What is your opinion?

That's about where I stand, with some preference for "do nothing".
I'm not convinced we need this.
        regards, tom lane