Re: SQL-standard function body

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vik Fearing
Тема Re: SQL-standard function body
Дата
Msg-id 61fa89a9-c39f-f780-1bf0-9ff4d387a9da@postgresfriends.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SQL-standard function body  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: SQL-standard function body  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 7/1/20 9:32 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> st 1. 7. 2020 v 20:19 odesílatel Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
> napsal:
> 
>> On 7/1/20 3:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I actually don't have a very clear idea of what the standard has to
>>> say about SQL-language functions. Does it just say it's a list of
>>> statements, or does it involve variables and control-flow constructs
>>> and stuff like that, too?
>>
>>
>> It's either a single sql statement, or a collection of them between
>> "begin atomic" and "end".  There are no variables or flow control
>> constructs or anything like that, just as there are no such things
>> outside of a function.
>>
> 
> What is the source of this comment?


The SQL Standard.


> Maybe we are speaking (and thinking)
> about different languages.


I think so, yes.


> I thought the language of SQL functions (ANSI/SQL) is SQL/PSM.


That is something else entirely, and not at all what Peter's patch is about.
-- 
Vik Fearing



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: POC: rational number type (fractions)