Re: wal stats questions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: wal stats questions
Дата
Msg-id 61993b3d-c609-7b32-fed2-1ec651c3bf4a@oss.nttdata.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: wal stats questions  (Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com>)
Ответы Re: wal stats questions
Список pgsql-hackers

On 2021/04/21 18:31, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>> BTW, is it better to change PgStat_Counter from int64 to uint64 because> there aren't any counters with negative
number?

On second thought, it's ok even if the counters like wal_records get overflowed.
Because they are always used to calculate the diff between the previous and
current counters. Even when the current counters are overflowed and
the previous ones are not, WalUsageAccumDiff() seems to return the right
diff of them. If this understanding is right, I'd withdraw my comment and
it's ok to use "long" type for those counters. Thought?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INT64_FORMAT in translatable strings
Следующее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: decoupling table and index vacuum