Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> writes:
> On 3/9/25 17:38, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Coverity is a little unhappy about this business in
>> _gin_begin_parallel:
> I don't mind doing it differently, but this code is just a copy from
> _bt_begin_parallel. So how come coverity does not complain about that?
> Or is that whitelisted?
Ah. Most likely somebody dismissed it years ago. Given that
precedent, I'm content to dismiss this one too.
regards, tom lane