Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Large Object Example testlo fails
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Large Object Example testlo fails |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6134.932048565@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | General Bug Report: Large Object Example testlo fails (Unprivileged user <nobody>) |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Mika.Saari@nokia.com writes:
> libpq++ Large Object Example testlo fails in PostgreSQL 6.5 but NOT
> in 6.4.2. The ERROR message is
> Connection to database 'template1' failed.
> PQsendQuery() -- There is no connection to the backend.
> 14. ./testlo template1 testlo test 0
It looks like testlo is now set up so that the first argument is a
conninfo string, not just a database name. So, something like
./testlo dbname=template1 testlo test 0
should work.
If the other method is still being recommended in some documentation
somewhere, then we need to fix that --- where did you find the info?
Also, I'd say that the error message here is pretty awful. Looks like
that's because PQconnectdb's original message about bogus syntax for a
conninfo string (which might actually have been helpful) is being
overwritten when the PgLargeObject constructors plow ahead with trying
to create and open a large object. They should not do that if the
underlying connection constructor failed :-(.
Finally, I don't particularly like the fact that both constructors for
PgLargeObject insist on creating and opening a LO. If you're going to
import() or export() you do not need an LO filehandle; and if you're
going to import() then the constructor-created LO is wasted, making
for a semi-permanent diskspace leak.
Perhaps the best way to design PgLargeObject is to make both creation
and opening "lazy", happening only at the first call that requires 'em.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: