Re: Two features left

Tom!

Thursday, November 28, 2002, 12:08:39 PM, you wrote:

TL> "Timur V. Irmatov" <itvthor@sdf.lonestar.org> writes:
>> It is very simple to implement (i think) it other way - just do not
>> force transaction to enter abort state afer exception.

TL> Better study the backend's error handling before you say that.

OK, I'M WRONG, SORRY...

but I still insist that using nested transaction to allow transactions
to continue after SQL exceptions is not a good idea..

it is like trying to go long round way instead of straight one.

Am I alone here with such a thought?  Are all happy about this way of
solving a problem (or adding a feature) ??

Sincerely yours,
Timur.