Re: Barman versus pgBackRest

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Steele
Тема Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
Дата
Msg-id 610d537a-fc2e-0938-c623-feeccca0aa64@pgmasters.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Barman versus pgBackRest  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On 9/4/18 7:41 AM, Ron wrote:
> On 03/09/2018 08:56 AM, David Steele wrote:
> 
>>> - use replication slots for backingup wal on the backup server.
>> Another good feature.  We have not added it yet because pgBackRest was
>> originally written for very high-volume clusters (100K+ WAL per day) and
>> our parallel async feature answers that need much better.  We recommend
>> a replicated standby for more update-to-date data.
> 
> Every N minutes you copy the WAL files to the backup server?

[Accidentally hit send on the previous post, here's the rest...]

WAL segments are transferred whenever Postgres indicates that a segment
is finished via the archive_command.  Async archiving "looks ahead" to
find WAL segments that are ready to archive.

You can use archive_timeout to force Postgres to push a WAL segment
every N seconds for clusters that have idle time.


Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Steele
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
Следующее
От: Holly Gibons
Дата:
Сообщение: PostgreSQL: Copy from File missing data error