Re: Improving avg performance for numeric
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Improving avg performance for numeric |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6095.1363710347@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Improving avg performance for numeric (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Improving avg performance for numeric
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> writes:
> Hadi Moshayedi <hadi@moshayedi.net> wrote:
>> I also noticed that this patch makes matview test fail. It seems
>> that it just changes the ordering of rows for queries like
>> "SELECT * FROM tv;". Does this seem like a bug in my patch, or
>> should we add "ORDER BY" clauses to this test to make it more
>> deterministic?
> I added some ORDER BY clauses.� That is probably a good thing
> anyway for purposes of code coverage.� Does that fix it for you?
Uh, what? Fooling around with the implementation of avg() should surely
not change any planning decisions.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: