Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings

--On 23. September 2009 14:10:39 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> FWIW, I looked the patch over quickly, and I think it will be fine once
> Bernd's comments are addressed.  In particular I agree with the
> objection to the name "pg_setting" as being confusingly close to
> "pg_settings".  But "pg_user_setting" isn't better.  Maybe
> "pg_db_role_settings"?

Jepp, that's better, +1 from me.

I'm done with this, too, so i will mark this as "Returned with Feedback", 
if no one objects?

-- 
Thanks
Bernd