Re: [JDBC] BUG #7766: Running a DML statement that affects more than 4 billion rows results in an exception

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [JDBC] BUG #7766: Running a DML statement that affects more than 4 billion rows results in an exception
Дата
Msg-id 6059.1356121026@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [JDBC] BUG #7766: Running a DML statement that affects more than 4 billion rows results in an exception  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Ответы Re: [JDBC] BUG #7766: Running a DML statement that affects more than 4 billion rows results in an exception  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения 
Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
> So an unsigned long won't fit inside a java long either, but hopefully it
> will never be necessary. That would be a huge number of changes.

I think we'll all be safely dead by the time anybody manages to process
2^63 rows in one PG command ;-).  If you can widen the value from int to
long on the Java side, that should be sufficient.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dave Cramer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [JDBC] BUG #7766: Running a DML statement that affects more than 4 billion rows results in an exception
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #7763: "CREATE TABLE ... (LIKE ... INCLUDING INDEXES ...)" does not work with indexes on composite types