Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>>> I have modified test_fsync to use test labels that match wal_sync_method
>>> values, and and added more tests for open_sync with different sizes.
>> Given that it was unclear whether the first such test was of any value,
>> why are you slowing down the program by adding more?
> Greg Smith indicated it has value, so I made it more complete. No?
My recollection of that discussion is a bit different: there wasn't a
clear-cut reason to rip it out. But the more tests you add to
test_fsync, the less useful it becomes.
regards, tom lane