On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 17:04 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > On tis, 2009-12-15 at 17:19 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> > > running with log_checkpoints = on
>> > >
>> > > pg_ctl -D foo -m fast stop
>> > >
>> > > log says
>> > >
>> > > LOG: received fast shutdown request
>> > > LOG: aborting any active transactions
>> > > LOG: shutting down
>> > > LOG: restartpoint starting: shutdown immediate
>> > >
>> > > Some of us know that the "immediate" word refers to the restartpoint
>> > > request, though that word causes conceptual conflict with the shutdown
>> > > mode, which was fast, not immediate.
>> > >
>> > > Think we need to change the wording of this
>> > >
>> > > LOG: restartpoint starting: shutdown immediate
>> > >
>> > > so it is clearer what we mean
>> >
>> > We *do* we mean? And why are we logging it?
>>
>> The words after the colon refer to options sent to RequestCheckpoint and
>> it is logged because we asked for it by doing log_checkpoints = on.
>>
>> I suggest we say "smoothed" when checkpoint option is !immediate. So we
>> will remove the word "immediate" from the message.
>
> Did we decide not the change this?
Personally, my opinion is that if we're going to print the message at
all, the names used for the message should match the names used in the
code. So -1 from me on calling it immediate in the code but smoothed
in the message. On the other hand, I have no personal attachment to
that message, so if other people feel it's not needed at all, I could
see removing it.
...Robert