Re: proposal: add columns created and altered topg_proc and pg_class

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: proposal: add columns created and altered topg_proc and pg_class
Дата
Msg-id 603c8f070904141137u25d43e66s4076bf81d669a5e9@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: proposal: add columns created and altered topg_proc and pg_class  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
>> the timestamp column caused the copy to be about 11.3% larger
>
> Grabbed the wrong numbers.  It's really 2.5%, but still....

Well, that's why Tom doesn't want to add it to pg_class.  But putting
it in a separate table will have no impact on the speed of anything
except DDL statements, and even then it won't require copying the
whole table, so the performance impact will be pretty minimal, so I
think it should be all right.

...Robert


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unicode string literals versus the world
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unicode string literals versus the world