On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> I think perhaps Optimizer / Executor would be more appropriate, since
>> these are not about hash indices but rather about hash joins. I will
>> look at doing that.
>
> Yes, please.
Done. See what you think...
>> Also I think the last item under Index / Hash is actually NOT done,
>> and belongs in the main index section rather than Index / Hash.
>
> Yep, I didn't realize that editing "Index" also does the subsections,
> while editing the subsections doesn't edit the upper level.
Heh. I'd write some webapps to do some of these things, but I haven't
been able to interest anyone in providing me with a
postgresql.org-based hosting arrangement.
>> The first item in the Index / Hash section doesn't really look like a
>> TODO, or at the very least it's unclear what the action item is
>> supposed to be.
>
> Yep, remove, thanks.
...Robert