Re: Problems with ordering (can't force query planner to use an index)

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Sebastjan Trepca <trepca@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have a table that links content together and it currently holds
> about 17 mio records. Typical query is a join with a content table and
> link table:
>
> noovo-new=# explain analyze SELECT "core_accessor"."id",
> "core_accessor"."content_type_id",
> "core_accessor"."object_id", "core_accessor"."ordering",
> "core_accessor"."label", "core_accessor"."date_posted",
> "core_accessor"."publish_state", "core_accessor"."nooximity_old",
> "core_accessor"."rising", "core_accessor"."nooximity",
> "core_accessor"."nooximity_old_date_posted",
> "core_accessor"."nooximity_date_posted", "core_accessor"."user_id",
> "core_accessor"."slot_id", "core_accessor"."slot_type_id",
> "core_accessor"."role", "core_base"."object_id",
> "core_base"."content_type_id", "core_base"."abstract",
> "core_base"."abstract_title", "core_base"."image",
>  "core_base"."date_posted", "core_base"."date_modified",
> "core_base"."date_expires", "core_base"."publish_state",
>  "core_base"."location", "core_base"."location_x",
> "core_base"."location_y", "core_base"."raw", "core_base"."author_id",
>  "core_base"."excerpt", "core_base"."state_id",
> "core_base"."country_id", "core_base"."language",
> "core_base"."_identifier",
>  "core_base"."slot_url", "core_base"."source_id",
> "core_base"."source_content_type_id", "core_base"."source_type",
>  "core_base"."source_value", "core_base"."source_title",
> "core_base"."direct_to_source", "core_base"."comment_count",
>  "core_base"."public" FROM "core_accessor" INNER JOIN core_base AS
> core_base ON core_base.content_type_id =
>  core_accessor.content_type_id AND core_base.object_id =
> core_accessor.object_id WHERE (("core_accessor"."slot_type_id" = 119
>  AND "core_accessor"."slot_id" = 472 AND "core_accessor"."label" = E''
> AND "core_accessor"."publish_state" >= 60 AND
>  "core_accessor"."role" IN (0) AND "core_accessor"."user_id" = 0))
> order by core_accessor.date_posted, core_accessor.nooximity LIMIT 5
> ;
>
>      QUERY PLAN
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Limit  (cost=31930.65..31930.66 rows=5 width=860) (actual
> time=711.924..711.927 rows=5 loops=1)
>   ->  Sort  (cost=31930.65..31937.80 rows=2861 width=860) (actual
> time=711.923..711.923 rows=5 loops=1)
>         Sort Key: core_accessor.date_posted, core_accessor.nooximity
>         Sort Method:  top-N heapsort  Memory: 31kB
>         ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..31883.13 rows=2861 width=860)
> (actual time=0.089..543.497 rows=68505 loops=1)
>               ->  Index Scan using core_accessor_fresh_idx on
> core_accessor  (cost=0.00..5460.07 rows=2970 width=92) (actual
> time=0.068..54.921 rows=69312 loops=1)
>                     Index Cond: ((slot_id = 472) AND (slot_type_id =
> 119) AND (label = ''::text) AND (user_id = 0) AND (role = 0) AND
> (publish_state >= 60))
>               ->  Index Scan using core_base_pkey on core_base
> (cost=0.00..8.88 rows=1 width=768) (actual time=0.004..0.005 rows=1
> loops=69312)
>                     Index Cond: ((core_base.object_id =
> core_accessor.object_id) AND (core_base.content_type_id =
> core_accessor.content_type_id))
>  Total runtime: 712.031 ms
> (10 rows)
>
> noovo-new=# select * from pg_stat_user_tables where relname='core_accessor';
>  relid | schemaname |    relname    | seq_scan | seq_tup_read |
> idx_scan | idx_tup_fetch | n_tup_ins | n_tup_upd | n_tup_del |
> n_tup_hot_upd | n_live_tup | n_dead_tup |          last_vacuum
>  | last_autovacuum |         last_analyze          | last_autoanalyze
>
-------+------------+---------------+----------+--------------+----------+---------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+---------------+------------+------------+-------------------------------+-----------------+-------------------------------+------------------
>  51159 | public     | core_accessor |       58 |    749773516 |
> 13785608 |     149165183 |      9566 |       548 |       347 |
>  206 |   17144303 |        251 | 2009-03-03 07:02:19.733778-06 |
>           | 2009-03-03 06:17:47.784268-06 |
> (1 row)
>
> noovo-new=# \d+ core_accessor;
>                                                  Table "public.core_accessor"
>          Column           |           Type           |
>         Modifiers                          | Description
>
---------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+-------------
>  id                        | bigint                   | not null
> default nextval('core_accessor_id_seq'::regclass) |
>  flavor                    | character varying(32)    |
>                                            |
>  content_type_id           | integer                  | not null
>                                            |
>  object_id                 | integer                  | not null
>                                            |
>  publish_state             | smallint                 | not null
>                                            |
>  date_posted               | timestamp with time zone | not null
>                                            |
>  user_id                   | integer                  |
>                                            |
>  slot_id                   | integer                  |
>                                            |
>  slot_type_id              | integer                  |
>                                            |
>  role                      | smallint                 |
>                                            |
>  ordering                  | integer                  |
>                                            |
>  author_id                 | integer                  |
>                                            |
>  nooximity_old             | double precision         | default 0.0
>                                            |
>  rising                    | double precision         | default 0.0
>                                            |
>  label                     | text                     |
>                                            |
>  nooximity                 | double precision         | not null
> default 1.0                                       |
>  nooximity_old_date_posted | timestamp with time zone |
>                                            |
>  nooximity_date_posted     | timestamp with time zone |
>                                            |
> Indexes:
>    "portal_metainfo_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
>    "portal_metainfo_unique_constr" UNIQUE, btree (content_type_id,
> object_id, user_id, slot_id, slot_type_id, role, label) CLUSTER
>    "core_accessor_date_idx" btree (date_posted, nooximity)
>    "core_accessor_dated_idx" btree (slot_id, slot_type_id, label,
> user_id, role, publish_state, date_posted, nooximity)
>    "core_accessor_fresh_idx" btree (slot_id, slot_type_id, label,
> user_id, role, publish_state)
>    "core_accessor_popularity_idx" btree (nooximity, date_posted)
> Check constraints:
>    "portal_metainfo_object_id_check" CHECK (object_id >= 0)
>    "portal_metainfo_owner_id_check" CHECK (slot_id >= 0)
> Foreign-key constraints:
>    "portal_metainfo_accessor_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (user_id)
> REFERENCES auth_user(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
>    "portal_metainfo_content_type_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY
> (content_type_id) REFERENCES django_content_type(id) DEFERRABLE
> INITIALLY DEFERRED
>    "portal_metainfo_owner_type_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (slot_type_id)
> REFERENCES django_content_type(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
> Has OIDs: no
>
>
>
> As far as I understand the explain, it fetches 68505 rows, matches
> them with core_base and then tries to sort them? AFAIK it would
> probably be much more effective to just find the records in accessor
> via core_accessor_dated_idx and then lookup the core_base table? But
> for some reason it doesn't want to?
>
> I ran analyze, vacuum and reindex but nothing helped. Queries just eat
> all the I/O and block. There is a huge difference between cached and
> non-cached queries, like 50.000 to 50 ms.
>
> Help! :)

Please send the output of EXPLAIN ANALYZE for this query.

...Robert