> I can see an argument about constraint_exclusion but
> default_statistics_target I don't.
Why not? I don't want to accept a big increase in ANALYZE times (or
planning times, though I'm really not seeing that at this point)
without some benefit.
>> It seems unlikely that you would want 256 MB of checkpoint segments on
>> a database that is only 100 MB (or even 500 MB). But you might very
>> well want that on a database that is 1 TB.
>
> It also seems unlikely that you would hit 256MB of checkpoint segments
> on a 100MB database before checkpoint_timeout and if you did, you
> certainly did need them.
So why do we have this parameter at all?
...Robert