> As this hasn't happened and I haven't been able to demonstrate it being useful
> myself I guess it makes more sense to separate the two now and set the
> sequential scan stuff aside until someone can demonstrate it being useful.
Sounds good. How soon do you think you can post updated patches?
> But as I said, it was mostly so I could tell what the slow start algorithm was
> doing and make sure it was doing anything at all in testing.
In that case, I think you should just rip it all out for now.
>> Department of nitpicking:
>
> Will clean these up, they all look valid. I thought I did clean things up
> already -- I guess you should be happy you're looking at it *after* that
> cleanup :/
Maybe it's you who should be glad... :-)
...Robert