Re: tablecmds: reject CLUSTER ON for partitioned tables earlier
| От | Chao Li |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: tablecmds: reject CLUSTER ON for partitioned tables earlier |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 602D405C-63BC-4383-AD43-28841CAF91C1@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: tablecmds: reject CLUSTER ON for partitioned tables earlier (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mar 16, 2026, at 16:51, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 11:38:17AM +0800, Chao Li wrote: >> On Jan 28, 2026, at 10:15, Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote: >>> * In 0001, replaced ereport with assert in >>> mark_index_clustered(). See my previous email for the analysis. > > I have looked at this one, and I think that it is right. Even in the > CLUSTER/VACUUM path, we have a relkind check before the sole caller of > rebuild_relation() that discards partitioned tables, so we would never > read mark_index_clustered() under this relkind. Applied. Hi Micheal, thank you very much for pushing 0001. > >>> * In 0002, removed the redundant check of relispartition from >>> * ATExecDropInherit(). > > I have not looked at this one. > -- > Michael Basically, 0002 does the same thing as 0001 just on a different sub-command of ALTER TABLE. Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: