On 14.10.2020 03:06, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> The patch includes a fix for primary->standby case. But I'm not sure
> we can do that in the cascaded case. A standby is not aware of the
> structure of a WAL blob and has no idea of up-to-where to send the
> received blobs. However, if we can rely on the behavior of CopyData
> that we always receive a blob as a whole sent from the sender at once,
> the cascaded standbys are free from the trouble (as far as the
> cascaded-standby doesn't crash just before writing the last-half of a
> record into pg_wal and after archiving the last full-segment, which
> seems unlikely.).
>
> regards.
>
Status update for a commitfest entry.
This entry was "Waiting on author" during this CF. As I see, the latest
message contains new version of the patch.
Does it need more work? Are you going to continue working on it?
--
Anastasia Lubennikova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company