Re: BUG #18576: Using EXPLAIN (VERBOSE) in information_schema.element_types returns ERROR: failed to find plan for
От | Andrei Lepikhov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18576: Using EXPLAIN (VERBOSE) in information_schema.element_types returns ERROR: failed to find plan for |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5e129a8e-5b8d-4a61-9776-59be99a2c14f@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #18576: Using EXPLAIN (VERBOSE) in information_schema.element_types returns ERROR: failed to find plan for (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #18576: Using EXPLAIN (VERBOSE) in information_schema.element_types returns ERROR: failed to find plan for
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 19/8/2024 18:36, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> writes: >> Thanks for pushing this! > >> But could you change this code a little bit? >> I reported this issue a year ago. At that time, it was triggered by the >> CustomScan node [1]. I haven't found the solution there [2]. Your code >> looks like a good tradeoff, and if you slightly change the code (like in >> the attachment), it allows CustomScan to survive such cases. > > This seems like it's making assumptions it shouldn't about what > CustomScan does. If there's an argument for doing this, it should > be added to the adjacent comments. Hm, I got into this problem many times using CustomScan node. Do you have some objections to not allow CustomScan node have a RECORD Var in the target list? For example, once I got this bug designing CustomScan which gathered lightweight statistics on-the-fly under a Sort and GROUP-BY nodes. I didn't change any tuple and had the same target list as the child node. Why we should analyse target list and don't use CustomScan if it contains Var of specific type? > > (Also, what's with the random change in contrib/Makefile?) Oops, it's a waste code, pardon. -- regards, Andrei Lepikhov
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: