Re: Barman versus pgBackRest

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ron
Тема Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
Дата
Msg-id 5dc5b1df-053a-3d61-e5e5-338de15d771e@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Barman versus pgBackRest  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Ответы Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
Список pgsql-general
On 09/04/2018 10:51 AM, David Steele wrote:
[snip]
> This will work, but I don't think it's what Ron is getting at.
>
> To be clear, it is not possible to restore a database into an *existing*
> cluster using pgBackRest selective restore.  This is a limitation of
> PostgreSQL file-level backups.
>
> To do what Ron wants you would need to restore it to a new cluster, then
> use pg_dump to logically dump and restore it to whatever cluster you
> want it in.  This still saves time since there is less to restore but is
> obviously not ideal.

That's exactly what I'm referring to.

Presumably I could restore it to a new cluster on the same VM via initdb on 
a different port and PGDATA directory?

-- 
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Steele
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
Следующее
От: David Steele
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Barman versus pgBackRest