Re: [HACKERS] Consistently catch errors from Python _New() functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Consistently catch errors from Python _New() functions
Дата
Msg-id 5ca74b8f-2c21-893b-d3e5-c819cb0c6f4d@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Consistently catch errors from Python _New() functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 11/18/17 12:05, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 11/17/17 12:16, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'm confused by the places that change PLy_elog calls to pass NULL:
>>>
>>> -        PLy_elog(ERROR, "could not create globals");
>>> +        PLy_elog(ERROR, NULL);
>>>
>>> How is that an improvement?  Otherwise it looks reasonable.
> 
>> If we pass NULL, then the current Python exception becomes the primary
>> error, so you'd end up with an "out of memory" error of some kind with a
>> stack trace, which seems useful.
> 
> Oh, I see.  Objection withdrawn.

Committed, thanks.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Add Roman numeral conversion to to_number
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: spgist rangetypes compiler warning (gcc 7.2.0)