Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables
| От | Grigory Smolkin |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5b48a2e8-571a-d24f-6a4a-cd5744e6f1dc@postgrespro.ru обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/05/2016 04:34 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Grigory Smolkin wrote:Funny part is that it never drops them. So when backend is finally terminated, it tries to drop them and fails with error: FATAL: out of shared memory HINT: You might need to increase max_locks_per_transaction If I understand that rigth, we are trying to drop all these temp tables in one transaction and running out of locks to do so.Hmm, yeah, I suppose it does that, and it does seem pretty inconvenient. It is certainly pointless to hold onto these locks for temp tables. I wonder how ugly would be to fix this problem ...
Thank you for your interest in this problem.
I dont think this is a source of problem. Ugly fix here would only force backend to terminate properly.
It will not help at all in cause of server crash or power outage.
We need a way to tell autovacuum, that we don`t need orphan temp tables, so they can be removed using existing routine.
The least invasive solution would be to have a guc, something like 'keep_orphan_temp_tables' with boolean value.
Which would determine a autovacuum worker policy toward encountered orphan temp tables.
-- Grigory Smolkin Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: