Re: pointless check in RelationBuildPartitionDesc

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: pointless check in RelationBuildPartitionDesc
Дата
Msg-id 5a60c5c4-6d19-4803-31d6-58e9dbeb0ac9@lab.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pointless check in RelationBuildPartitionDesc  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: pointless check in RelationBuildPartitionDesc  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2018/09/05 1:50, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Proposed patch.  Checking isnull in a elog(ERROR) is important, because
> the column is not marked NOT NULL.  This is not true for other columns
> where we simply do Assert(!isnull).

Looks good.  Thanks for taking care of other sites as well.

@@ -14705,7 +14705,9 @@ ATExecDetachPartition(Relation rel, RangeVar *name)

     (void) SysCacheGetAttr(RELOID, tuple, Anum_pg_class_relpartbound,
                            &isnull);
-    Assert(!isnull);
+    if (isnull)
+        elog(ERROR, "null relpartbound for relation %u",
+             RelationGetRelid(partRel));

In retrospect, I'm not sure why this piece of code is here at all; maybe
just remove the SycCacheGetAttr and Assert?

Regards,
Amit



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug fix for glibc broke freebsd build in REL_11_STABLE
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes