Re: Mop-up around psql's \connect behavior
| От | Chapman Flack |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Mop-up around psql's \connect behavior |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5F90BE91.5030306@anastigmatix.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Mop-up around psql's \connect behavior (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/21/20 18:59, Tom Lane wrote: > I think the reason we've not had complaints about this is that the > situation normally doesn't arise in interactive sessions (since we > won't release the old connection voluntarily), while scripts are > likely not designed to cope with connection losses anyway. These > facts militate against spending a whole lot of effort on a fix, > but still we ought to reduce the silliness factor. What I propose > is to complain if we have no o_conn *and* we are asked to re-use > parameters from it. Otherwise, it's fine. I've been getting around it just by saying \c "connstring" . . . which works. It gives me a tiny thrill every time I do it, like I'm getting away with something. Which is why I haven't been complaining. I suppose I wouldn't complain if it were fixed, either. Regards, -Chap
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: