On Apr 24, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah. It seems like a bad idea if the distribution "name" doesn't
> include sufficient information to tell which version it contains.
> I had in mind a convention like "distribution version x.y.z always
> contains extension version x.y". Seems like minor version versus
> major version would be the way to explain that.
Does that apply to PostgreSQL itself? I guess release 9.0.4 contains 9.0. But it's a convention.
David