> On Oct 20, 2025, at 6:58 AM, Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2025, Rob Sargent wrote:
>
>>> Okay. Now I'm curious: why do you write this?
>
>> The way I read your description of how you use these columns currently
>> suggests to me that they could be handled by a single timestamp column.
>> The cost/benefit of converting is another thing altogether.
>
> Rob,
>
> Since either way works I'll save the time cost of converting because my
> tables will never be really large.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rich
>
For sure! Your call
>