> On 22 Feb 2023, at 21:33, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2023-02-22 15:10:11 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Rebased patch to handle breakage of v2 due to bd8d453e9b.
>
> I think we probably should just apply this? The current behaviour doesn't seem
> right, and I don't see a downside of the new behaviour?
Agreed, I can't think of a regression test where we wouldn't want this. My
only concern was if any of the ECPG tests were doing something odd that would
break from this but I can't see anything.
--
Daniel Gustafsson