(2019/04/26 13:58), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> (2019/04/26 13:20), Amit Langote wrote:
>> + Note that this function is also called when inserting routed tuples
>> into
>> + a foreign-table partition or executing<command>COPY FROM</command> on
>> + a foreign table, in which case it is called in a different way than it
>> + is in the<command>INSERT</command> case.
>>
>> Maybe minor, but should the last part of this sentence read as:
>>
>> ...in which case it is called in a different way than it is in the case
>> <command>INSERT</command> is operating directly on the foreign table.
>>
>> ?
>
> Yeah, but I think it would be OK to just say "the INSERT case" because
> this note is added to the docs for ExecForeignInsert(), which allows the
> FDW to directly insert into foreign tables as you know, so users will
> read "the INSERT case" as "the case <command>INSERT</command> is
> operating directly on the foreign table".
Pushed as-is. I think we can change that later if necessary.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita