Re: House style for DocBook documentation?
| От | Chapman Flack |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: House style for DocBook documentation? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5C81E9B7.1050909@anastigmatix.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: House style for DocBook documentation? (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: House style for DocBook documentation?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/15/19 11:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 25/01/2019 15:37, Chapman Flack wrote: >>> If they are already processed that way, does that mean the >>> >>> o Do not use text with <ulink> so the URL appears in printed output >>> >>> in README.links should be considered obsolete, and removed even, and >>> doc authors should feel free to put link text in <ulink> without >>> hesitation? > > Committed that change. I only now noticed that probably this should also have been changed: -o If you want to supply text, use <link>, else <xref> +o If you want to supply text, use <link> or <ulink>, else <xref> Regards, -Chap
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: