Re: Infinity vs Error for division by zero

On 03/01/19 17:34, Tom Lane wrote:

> but I think it'd be fragile to use.  (See the "Type Conversion"
> chapter in the manual for the gory details, and note that domains
> get smashed to their base types mighty readily.)
> 
> Using custom operator names would work better/more reliably.

Or a new base type (LIKE float8) rather than a domain?

Regards,
-Chap