On 09/20/18 00:44, Tom Lane wrote:
>> 1. fiddle the loader to always pass read_only => false to SPI calls,
>> regardless of the volatility of the function it is loading for.
>> 2. leave the loader alone, and adjust install_jar (an infrequent
>> operation) to do something heretical with its on-entry snapshot.
>
> I suspect #1 is less likely to have bad side-effects. But I've not
> done any careful analysis.
Just noticed too: a thing prepared with the SPI_prepare... functions
(which take no read_only or snapshot parameters) later gets executed by
one of the SPI_execute... functions, which do take such parameters.
I assume the analysis and planning take place with reference to some
snapshot---necessarily? right?---(though on a quick skim of the code
I'm not yet sure what snapshot that is or how chosen), but the
parameters accepted by SPI_execute... can lead to a different snapshot
being in effect then.
Is that by design? Does it imply certain caveats I should be careful
about? Does it trigger any amount of replanning?
-Chap