Re: Partition column should be part of PK

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christophe Pettus
Тема Re: Partition column should be part of PK
Дата
Msg-id 5B9DB883-EED5-4378-ABEC-03FCC11560B2@thebuild.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Partition column should be part of PK  (Nagaraj Raj <nagaraj.sf@yahoo.com>)
Ответы Re: Partition column should be part of PK
Список pgsql-performance

> On Jul 8, 2021, at 20:32, Nagaraj Raj <nagaraj.sf@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> My apologies for making confusion with new thread. Yes its same issue related to earlier post.
>
> I was trying to figure out  how to ensure unique values for columns (billing_account_guid, ban). If i add partition
keyto constraint , it wont be possible what im looking for. 
>
> My use case as below
>
> INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * from t2 ON CONFLICT (billing_account_guid,ban) DO UPDATE SET something…
>
> Or
>
> INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * from t2 ON CONFLICT constraint (pk or uk)(billing_account_guid,ban) DO UPDATE SET something…

Right now, PostgreSQL does not support unique indexes on partitioned tables (that operate across all partitions) unless
thepartition key is included in the index definition.  If it didn't have that requirement, it would have to
independently(and in a concurrency-supported way) scan every partition individually to see if there is a duplicate key
violationin any of the partitions, and the machinery to do that does not exist right now. 

If the goal is to make sure there is only one (billing_account_guid, ban, date) combination across the entire partition
set,you can create an index unique index on the partitioned set as (billing_account_guid, ban, date), and INSERT ... ON
CONFLICTDO NOTHING works properly then. 

If the goal is to make sure there is only one (billing_account_uid, ban) in any partition regardless of date, you'll
needto do something more sophisticated to make sure that two sessions don't insert an (billing_account_uid, ban) value
intotwo different partitions.  This isn't a great fit for table partitioning, and you might want to reconsider if
partitioningthe table is the right answer here.  If you *must* have table partitioning, a possible algorithm is: 

-- Start a transaction
-- Hash the (billing_account_uid, ban) key into a 64 bit value.
-- Use that 64 bit value as a key to a call to pg_advisory_xact_lock() [1] to, in essence, create a signal to any other
transactionattempting to insert that pair that it is being modified. 
-- SELECT on that pair to make sure one does not already exist.
-- If one does not, do the INSERT.
-- Commit, which releases the advisory lock.

This doesn't provide quite the same level of uniqueness that a cross-partition index would, but if this is the only
codepath that does the INSERT, it should keep duplicate from showing up in different partitions. 

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-admin.html#FUNCTIONS-ADVISORY-LOCKS


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nagaraj Raj
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Partition column should be part of PK
Следующее
От: Nagaraj Raj
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Partition column should be part of PK