Re: Allow pg_signal_backend members to use pg_log_backend_memory_stats().

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bossart, Nathan
Тема Re: Allow pg_signal_backend members to use pg_log_backend_memory_stats().
Дата
Msg-id 5B3B3232-14FC-4A90-84BD-4ABA78D2898B@amazon.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Allow pg_signal_backend members to use pg_log_backend_memory_stats().  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 10/25/21, 2:21 AM, "Bharath Rupireddy" <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:40 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> Hmm.  Why don't you split the patch into two parts that can be
>> discussed separately then?  There would be one to remove all the
>> superuser() checks you can think of, and a potential second to grant
>> those function's execution to some system role.
>
> IMO, in this thread we can focus on remvong the
> pg_log_backend_memory_contexts()'s superuser() check and +1 to start a
> separate thread to remove superuser() checks for the other functions
> and REVOKE the permissions in appropriate places, for system functins
> system_functions.sql files, for extension functions, the extension
> installation .sql files. See [1] and [2].

I like the general idea of removing hard-coded superuser checks first
and granting execution to predefined roles second.  I don't have any
strong opinion about what should be done in this thread and what
should be done elsewhere.

Nathan


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: XTS cipher mode for cluster file encryption
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: Remove unused wait events.