On 04/06/18 19:52, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-04-06 19:46:25 -0400, Chapman Flack wrote:
>> Hasn't been updated as built-in support grew for temp files, DSM segments,
>> and JIT contexts.
>>
>> With enough luck, a README update won't break anything.
>
> Wouldn't it be a better idea not to have a list there, that's guaranteed
> to get out of date?
That might look like this, then.
But I'm not sure how bad it is to have a list. How often does ResourceOwner
get taught a new type? It took nine years to grow these last three.
-Chap