Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw
| От | Etsuro Fujita |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5AA63257.5010805@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/03/09 20:55), Etsuro Fujita wrote: > (2018/03/08 14:24), Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> For local constraints to be enforced, we use remote >> constraints. For local WCO we need to use remote WCO. That means we >> create many foreign tables pointing to same local table on the foreign >> server through many views, but it's not impossible. > > Maybe I don't understand this correctly, but I guess that it would be > the user's responsibility to not create foreign tables in such a way. I think I misunderstood your words. Sorry for that. I think what you proposed would be a solution for this issue, but I'm not sure that's a good one because that wouldn't work for the data sources that don't support views with WCO options. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: