Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly
| От | Etsuro Fujita |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5A82DCCE.3060107@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/02/11 6:24), Tom Lane wrote: > However, jaguarundi still shows a problem: > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=jaguarundi&dt=2018-02-10%2008%3A41%3A32 > > (previous run similar, so it's semi-reproducible even after this patch). > jaguarundi uses -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, so you might try a few repetitions > with that. I ran the postgres_fdw regression test with no sleep two times in a CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS-enabled build, and then the regression test with the sleep (60 seconds) two times, but I couldn't reproduce that in both cases. I suspect the changes in the order of the RETURNING output there was still caused by autovacuum kicking in partway through the run. So to make the regression test more stable against autovacuum, I'd propose to modify the regression test to disable autovacuum for the remote table (ie "S 1"."T 1") (and perform VACUUM ANALYZE to that table manually instead) in hopes of getting that fixed. Attached is a patch for that. I think changes added by the previous patch wouldn't make sense anymore, so I removed those changes. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: