Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5

Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at> writes:
> Would the "lock_timeout" work for all to be acquired locks individually,
> or all of them combined for the statement? The individual application
> of the timeout for every locks individually wouldn't be too nice.

I think the way you're describing would be both harder to implement
and full of its own strange traps.
        regards, tom lane