Re: Migrating from 8.2 to 9.1 : invalid port number

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Migrating from 8.2 to 9.1 : invalid port number
Дата
Msg-id 5970.1337790833@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Migrating from 8.2 to 9.1 : invalid port number  (Alberto Zanon <alberto.zanon@edistar.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Alberto Zanon <alberto.zanon@edistar.com> writes:
> I agree with you about the concept of "port number". I only wanted to know if it is a new behavior of Postgresql 9.1.


More like 9.0, according to our commit logs:

Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Branch: master Release: REL9_0_BR [61be11ff0] 2009-09-27 03:43:10 +0000

    Make libpq reject non-numeric and out-of-range port numbers with a suitable
    error message, rather than blundering on and failing with something opaque.

    Sam Mason

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Dilger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: FATAL: lock file "postmaster.pid" already exists
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: significant performance hit whenever autovacuum runs after upgrading from 9.0 -> 9.1