Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Chapman Flack
Тема Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
Дата
Msg-id 59557AB7.1060203@anastigmatix.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 06/25/17 21:20, Chapman Flack wrote:
> I want to make sure I understand what the deadlock potential is
> in this case. AdvanceXLInsertBuffer will call WaitXLogInsertionsToFinish
> ...
> Does not the fact we hold all the insertion slots exclude the possibility
> that any dirty buffer (preceding the one we're touching) needs to be checked
> for in-flight insertions?     [in the filling-out-the-log-tail case only]

Anyone?

Or have I not even achieved 'wrong' yet?

-Chap



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Khandekar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
Следующее
От: Satyanarayana Narlapuram
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: protocol version negotiation (Re: [HACKERS] Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH- version compatibility)