On 8/7/17 00:32, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 04:09:43PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On 8/1/17 00:17, Noah Misch wrote:
>>>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Peter,
>>>> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
>>>> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
>>>> v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
>>>> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
>>>> this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
>>>> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
>>>> well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
>>>> toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
>>>
>>> I'm looking into this now and will report by Friday.
>>
>> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
>> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
>> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
>
> I think this open item has closed by the commit
> 7e174fa793a2df89fe03d002a5087ef67abcdde8 ?
Yes. I have updated the wiki page now.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services