Re: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5947.1563901608@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> writes:
> We are obliged to assume that we won't have the desired behavior
> without detecting whether running as a service or not.
> My investigation convinced me that there is no way for a process
> to detect wheter it is running as a service (except the process
> directly called from system (aka entry function)). In other
> words, only pg_ctl knows that and other processes doesn't have a
> clue for that. The processes other than postmaster can receive
> that information via backend variables. But the postmaster has no
> way to get the information from pg_ctl other than command line
> parameter, environment variable or filesystem (or PIPE?).
> If we see the complexity meets the benefit, we can use, say,
> command line parameter, WER dialog can be shown when server is
> started in console but the parameter being specified, but I don't
> think it is a problem.
Not being a Windows user, I don't have much to say about the big
question of whether disabling WER is still a good idea or not. But
I will say that in my experience, behavioral differences between
Postgres started manually and Postgres started as a daemon are bad.
So I think going out of our way to make the cases behave differently
on Windows is probably not a good plan.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: