Re: set_ps_display during recovery

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: set_ps_display during recovery
Дата
Msg-id 5925.1191165375@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: set_ps_display during recovery  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: set_ps_display during recovery  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-patches
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 10:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps "fetching XXX" vs "restoring XXX"?

> Not sure if I read you right, so one more time for clarity:

> IMHO wording should be
>   "restoring  X" before we send to archive to get file (archive only)
>   "recovering X" once we have the file (archive or not)

Those two words seem close enough in meaning that most admins wouldn't
be clear on the difference.  I like "fetching" or "retrieving" for
the activity of getting a WAL segment from an archive, because in cases
where the activity takes long enough to be noticeable, it's probably
because you are physically getting the file from someplace else.
In the specific context of a warm standby machine, "waiting for" would
be the bon mot, but that would probably be inappropriate for other
contexts.

As for the second-phase activity, "recovering" is fine, or maybe
"processing"?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: set_ps_display during recovery
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: set_ps_display during recovery