Re: psql client does not handle WSAEWOULDBLOCK on Windows
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql client does not handle WSAEWOULDBLOCK on Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 592101.1756828301@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | psql client does not handle WSAEWOULDBLOCK on Windows (Ning <ning94803@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > This is going to require some platform-specific check that I don't > have with me, though I am ready to accept that what you are telling > here is true and that we should apply this macro. Could somebody > check that a bit more in depth? Andrew D. perhaps? > One thing that I don't understand is why does this only apply after > the first call of pqsecure_raw_read() in gss_read()? There is a > second call of pqsecure_raw_read() you are not covering but it would > surely need the same treatment, no? > Also, what about pqsecure_raw_write() in pqsecure_open_gss()? > Shouldn't the same check apply? Yeah, I think we pretty much need to use SOCK_ERRNO, SOCK_ERRNO_SET, and SOCK_STRERROR (if relevant) throughout fe-secure-gssapi.c. Directly using errno is correct for syscalls related to the file system, but I think everything in this file is dealing with socket-related errors. Certainly the underlying pqsecure_raw_read and pqsecure_raw_write layer expects those macros to be used. Like you, I'm not really in a position to test this on Windows ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: