Re: Documentation about PL transforms

On 2022-07-28 01:51, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> Would it be clearer to say:
>> 
>> It also contains the OID of the intended procedural language and 
>> whether
>> that procedural language is declared as <literal>TRUSTED</literal>.
>> While these values are redundant if the inline handler is serving only
>> a single procedural language, they are necessary to allow one inline
>> handler to serve more than one PL.
> 
> ok

I will probably be unable to produce a new patch for this CF.
Family obligation.

Regards,
-Chap