pushed. Hope, second try will be successful.
Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> Thank you, pushed
>
> Amit Langote wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> On 2018/04/11 0:36, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>>>> Does the attached fix look correct? Haven't checked the fix with
>>>> ATTACH
>>>> PARTITION though.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Attached patch seems to fix the problem. However, I would rather get
>>>> rid of modifying stmt->indexParams. That seems to be more logical
>>>> for me. Also, it would be good to check some covering indexes on
>>>> partitioned tables. See the attached patch.
>>>
>>> Seems right way, do not modify incoming object and do not copy rather
>>> large and deep nested structure as suggested by Amit.
>>
>> Yeah, Alexander's suggested way of using a separate variable for
>> indexParams is better.
>>
>>> But it will be better to have a ATTACH PARTITION test too.
>>
>> I have added tests. Actually, instead of modifying existing tests, I
>> think it might be better to have a separate section at the end of
>> indexing.sql to test covering indexes feature for partitioned tables.
>>
>> Attached find updated patch.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amit
>>
>
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/